================================================ Subject: Re: NCR: You know what I think??? From: "Joe Earles" To: Date: Thu 4 Jul 2002 23:56:03 +0000 ================================================ I, for one would not count negative responses to General Zod. That dude just BEGS for it. That would bring Debbi's numbers down once again. One thing that you didn't point out, though, is that most of the time when Debbi comes out with something curt, it's in response to something that was aimed at her in the first place. Slap me and you can expect to be slapped back. Period. Why should Debbi's responses be different? It shouldn't you say? I agree. So deduct from your findings the responses to a direct assault on Debbi and think you'll watch those numbers shrink like scrote in ice water. > Be glad that you weren't on this list back about two or three years ago. I > clearly remember getting upwards of 300 emails per day, sometimes hitting the > 500 mark. Of course, that was back when this list was still fun to be on, and > there were rarely any fights, because everyone knew how to be a grown-up. Or at > least how to use delete, ignore, and/or unsubscribe features. > I strongly doubt that telling the list members to take the fights off list will > work at this point, since the list will be gone in a few days anyway. It's > never worked in the past, and it especially won't work now. > And I would suggest that you look at others on this list before pointing fingers > at Debbi, including yourself. Since July 1st, you have sent six posts to the > list. Four of those could be interpreted as "rude". That makes 67% of your > posts the same type that you're complaining about. Your buddy Michele Arnold > has sent out fifteen posts. Thirteen of those could be called "rude". (87%) > And seven of them were specifically rude to Debbi. (47% of her posts were > specifically rude to Debbi). Debbi has sent out nineteen posts to the list. > Counting her response to Zod, six of those could conceivably be interpreted as > "rude". That's only 32%. And DEBBI is the one you're calling rude? I'd say > that you might want to check your facts a bit before you start accusing others > of causing trouble on the list. Especially considering that I'd wager in a > popular vote, Debbi would have more support here than you. And if the IQs of > people were added up for and against Debbi, I'm sure she'd win by an > overwhelming majority. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Linda Eshtman > To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM > Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 6:52 PM > Subject: NCR: You know what I think??? > > > I think as not to get 80+ emails a day (gosh! It took me 20 minutes to sort > through it all!!!) for those who write really rude things to YOU hehehe like > DebbiR, you could either report it, ignore it, or send a reply privately instead > of having the rest of us look @ it as well. > > As for DebbiR, I don't think those rude full of flack emails belong on this > list. If you really wanna screw up peoples' days, you can just do it somewhere > else. I am sick and tired of it and I can assure that most of us are. > > I really don't know if there is anyone here who likes to sort through 80 or so > emails of rude remarks, dissagreements and anything else unrelated to Creed. I > know this isn't related to Creed but I'm just pointing something out! Jeez. > > LE > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp