================================================ Subject: Re: What's This Life For *censored* From: "Sally Wu" To: Date: Mon 22 Apr 2002 09:32:55 -0500 ================================================ I'm guessing you didn't interpret my meaning in the first place. The bonus is not the censorship, but the video clip...for that one person it would've been for both, but not for me and quite evidently not for you. That one person found it offensive for the use of "goddamn" in the song. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Mears" Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:24:03 -0500 To: Subject: RE: What's This Life For *censored* > Okay, now how about YOU read properly. I know full well what you were > driving at, and my question remains valid as originally asked. > > What the HELL is WRONG with you people, believing that CENSORSHIP, in > ANY form, is a BONUS? That's just totally ridiculous, especially when > one considers that many radio stations are now allowing "goddamn" to go > UNCENSORED. It's also not uncommon to hear "shit" make it past the > bleep, and even the occasional "fuck" (especially if you're hearing > Disturbed). > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sally Wu [mailto:creed@musician.org] > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 9:05 AM > To: creed-discuss@winduplist.com > Cc: kthulu@comteck.com > Subject: RE: What's This Life For *censored* > > I don't think you got me Keith...there was a guy who really really > wanted another version of What's This Life For without GD in it. Read it > properly before you go shouting at us. > > > > -- _______________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp