Agreed. No problem with that at all.

I have always detested censorship in any form - EXCEPT - what I allow my kids as a responsible father.

BTW, I notice the majority of my posts are not making it to the list, which is rather sad. As a matter of principle, I would normally leave the lamers to themselves, but this one is personal and I choose to remain.

NP - Freak On A Leash, Korn

More on-topic discussion WILL be facilitated, but if that comes at the expense of a totally open forum I still have a problem with it. I'd rather deal with the in-fighting and use my delete key wisely as opposed to having someone else decide what I read... and if you get rid of the majority of the in-fighting you have a relatively centered discussion about Creed, which is in no small part the objective behind moderating the group. I say, keep your moderating mitts off this list and let ME moderate what I read and what I don't.

----- Original Message -----

From: Greg Keltner

Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 7:02 PM

Subject: RE: Re: moderated list and "Who's Got My Back' (song)

I was replying to the author of the below block of text, which appears to be you.

You are correct in your moderation views, and I normally agree with most of what you post, but what does this say?? "I agree that more on-topic discussion will be facilitated by moderating the list"

It's almost a contradiction in one paragraph.

"I have to admit, I subscribed to this list to talk about Creed and I agree that more on-topic discussion will be facilitated by moderating the list. But with all due respect, if I had the choice of talking about various subjects in a bar and taking a beer bottle to the head because I offended someone or chatting about Creed and Creed alone from a prison cell I'd just want to know if the bar in question has Sam Adams or Guiness on tap so I could toss back a couple good cold ones before getting beaned."