================================================ Subject: Re: "Sapp" (What article called him) - Stapp's Napster Stance link From: "Keith Mears" To: Date: Sun 10 Mar 2002 00:32:24 -0500 ================================================ Whatever, Jim. I actually took the time to listen to some opposing views regarding my treatment of you on this list, and have made SEVERAL attempts to give you the benefit of the doubt this time around, and have managed to not bash you in the slightest. But it's safe to say now that this was a failed venture, and you're headed back to the kill file once again. Jesus, my head is KILLING me all of a sudden. -----Original Message----- From: Creed Discussion List [mailto:CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM] On Behalf Of Creed - 7M3 - Live Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 3:24 AM To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM Subject: Re: "Sapp" (What article called him) - Stapp's Napster Stance link Do I sense different realities here? What point were you trying to convey? You stated that I was holding up another listers stance. I was only relaying what an article stated about Scott's stance. Regardless to what or who the person was. nor how they felt about me. It is called being objective. Not banding with others. No matter how wrong they are. Jim To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp