================================================ Subject: Re: "Sapp" (What article called him) - Stapp's Napster Stance link From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" To: Date: Sat 9 Mar 2002 03:24:17 -0500 ================================================ Do I sense different realities here? What point were you trying to convey? You stated that I was holding up another listers stance. I was only relaying what an article stated about Scott's stance. Regardless to what or who the person was. nor how they felt about me. It is called being objective. Not banding with others. No matter how wrong they are. Jim Keith Mears wrote: >Say, way to miss the point, Jim. Even when I'm in a NON-bashing mode, >you make me want to bash you, but I'll refrain, somehow. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Creed Discussion List [mailto:CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM] On >Behalf Of Creed - 7M3 - Live >Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1:25 AM >To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM >Subject: Re: "Sapp" (What article called him) - Stapp's Napster Stance >link > >I like to stay with what Scott's actual views are. Not to try and create >his position, on this issue. > >Jim > -- Don't you wish that all the people who sincerely want to help you could agree with each other? To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp