Re: Seems our music thieves have moved on to easier targets

From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" <creed7m3live@COLUMBUS.RR.COM>
To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM>
Date: Fri
8 Mar 2002 22:41:03 -0500

Melissa Garner wrote:

ok, let's stop talking about this! it's making me tired!

Since there is no end in site, regarding the downloading of music, for free. I'll comment to the comments about the prices being effected by the practice. There is no connection to the two. RIAA are greedy! They would not lower the prices of their CDs. If they lowered the price of the CD. Then there would be no need for people to download the music. It would be easier to just buy the music. More albums would be sold.

The price for CDs have been high for awhile. I was hoping that the presence of Napster, and services similar, would make the record companies become less greedy. It didn't happen that way.

Anyway! Technology allows for the free music. Record companies make it more practical. Rule breaking usually leads to change. If the majority are the ones effected by the limiting regulation. No law was changed because of acceptance. It was changed because of protest or mass disobedience to the law.

Buy it, if you want to. But, it is more practical, to get it for free. The record company will gouge us! Regardless to the amount of unpaying music listeners.

Later,

Jim

-- 
Show me a man who is a good loser and I'll show you a man who is playing
golf with his boss.

To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp