Re: nit wit needs help again

From: "Verrronica Smith" <Verrronica@AOL.COM>
To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM>
Date: Wed
19 Dec 2001 00:52:21 EST

Actually, I've been debating sending out basically the same message....of course I wouldn't have used the foul language, nor the insults and ranting....but I've been pretty much deleting everything with this topic heading, and now I don't know if I've missed anything I shouldn't have deleted, because you obviously aren't talking about the same thing anymore.


In a message dated 12/19/01 12:24:26 AM Eastern Standard Time, creedyrn4ever@HOTMAIL.COM writes:


quite appropriate, actually...esp given the addy...message not withstanding!
Lee


>From: Ross Johnson
>Reply-To: Ross Johnson
>To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM
>Subject: Re: nit wit needs help again
>Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 03:43:20 -0000
>
>I think the subject is quite fitting to be honest.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Quiksilver1280@aol.com
> To: ross@aolhater.freeserve.co.uk
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:39 AM
> Subject: Re: nit wit needs help again
>
>
> GET FUCKING SUBJECT LINES THAT RELATE TO WHAT IT SAYS FUCKING DUMBSHIT MORONS....DONT BE AFRAID TO MAKE THE SUBJECT LINE WHAT THE FUCKING SUBJECT IS...QUIT ALL THE FUCKING "RE:'S" GET A LIFE MORONS
> SATAN
> 666