Re: Simple question attacked

From: "Keith P. Mears" <kthulu@COMTECK.COM>
To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM>
Date: Wed
12 Dec 2001 02:22:35 -0500

I gave up on it as soon as I saw Jim's name at the top of the post, because even if every other member of the list pointed out to him that there was no attack, Jim would still maintain there was. That's just his way. If we were to tell him that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, he'd find a way to tell us we were wrong.

----- Original Message -----

From: Bklynbaby727@AOL.COM

To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM

Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:18 AM

Subject: Re: Simple question attacked

In a message dated 12/12/2001 1:59:39 AM Eastern Standard Time, kthulu@COMTECK.COM writes:

There was no attack anywhere in there and I'm sure we're all still waiting for you to point out the part that makes either response an attack.

Correction: YOU might be waiting for that, but I've LONG since given up on that ever happening.

NP: My Sacrifice

Of course it's not happening. How could he possibly point out something that wasn't there in the first place?