================================================ Subject: Re: The verdict is in: Scott Stapp's a fucking lush. From: To: Date: Wed 28 Nov 2001 02:42:07 EST ================================================ Well this may come back to slap me in the face, but I have to say it. Please take this only as constructive criticism. What you said (below) is a valid opinion, and I think most of us agree with you. But the way you originally stated it is what made people defensive. It's not WHAT you say or think, as much as the WAY you say it that upsets people. But for the record, I agree with what you think, as stated in this email. Jen In a message dated 11/28/2001 1:30:38 AM Central Standard Time, debbir@lafornara.com writes: << Yeah, but I think that people misunderstood me and perhaps it's my own fault. I was never meaning to imply that I look down on him. I was just saying that it seemed to me that he was loaded during the broadcast last night. Lots of people who heard it agree with me. Not that getting loaded is a bad thing - hellll I'm always first in line! But, when he chooses to make decisions about how he behaves during a publicity event, he's fair game for my opinions. You haven't ever, nor will you ever hear me opine about his behavior or demeanor in a private or even semi-public setting (getting into fights at adult clubs, for example) because I strongly feel it's none of my goddamned business. When he appeared on a radio show representing Creed, his demeanor and behavior became my business. >> To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp