================================================ Subject: Re: Dictionary and AOL (was Re: marc_Levitt..a lesson to remember..please read) From: "Kevin L. Brown" To: Date: Sun 4 Nov 2001 11:27:30 -0800 ================================================ You don't even KNOW what Microsoft claims as evidenced by your continuing to post "here's what it does" only to then back it up with "I don't really know". To remind you (as you're clearly running as fast from it as you possibly can), your claim was: "Since the browser is supposed to be incorporated into the operating system. It might make your computer simulate XP." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" To: Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 11:18 AM Subject: Re: Dictionary and AOL (was Re: marc_Levitt..a lesson to remember..please read) > I don't know the court case. But I do realize that MS said that the > browser could not be removed from the operating system. (Windows 95). > Since it was interdependent with the operating system. > > Basically, I don't believe a word that MS claims. Be it a claim that > Linux is a competing operating system. Or that the browser is or is not > needed by the operating system. And cannot be removed without messing up > the system, even more. > > Oh well! Sorry I missed the response to the browser question. Related to > if it does improve the stability of ME or is actually a seperate and > free standing program. > > Jim To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp