================================================ Subject: Re: Jim's behavior.. By Jim From: "creed -7m3 - live" To: Date: Thu 30 Aug 2001 17:52:15 -0400 ================================================ Thanks Keith, On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 22:39, Keith P. Mears wrote: > As Jim has reasonably stated his own position, I will also attempt to clear > the air a bit. I too regret the level to which I sank with some of my posts > in response to Jim (in the thread which has recently caused so much strife). > Jim and I have spoken privately and smoothed over the roughest spots. So > for what it's worth coming from me, welcome back Jim. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "creed -7m3 - live" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:22 PM > Subject: Jim's behavior.. By Jim > > > > In reference to the whole list interactions that were on the threads > > that most people deleted. I did say something that was way out of > > character. Something that I am unpleased with myself about. > > > > There really isn't any excuse to make such statements. But constant > > badgering can lead people into doing out of character things. > > > > Anyway, the comments are past tense. I can only appologize (and did) to > > the person that the comment was made to. A public appology to all of > > those that read the remark is also due. So I appologize to those on the > > list that I offended also. > > > > Those that have noted my comments (from the past). Have probably noticed > > that I even refrain from the usually acceptable four letter words. > > > > The issues that led to my ill behavior were the same ones that kept that > > thread going for such a long period of time. I regret the length of time > > that the subject took out of conversations. Though the issues have > > helped me decide about business practices and other aspects of the > > company that was so heavily discussed. > > > > The main thing that I dislike about some conversations that take place > > on the list are the personal attacks that have been levied. There are > > too many instances regarding personal attacks and they need to be halted > > from within the list environment. > > > > It should be fair game to refute an issue. But, it is absolutely > > horrible to attack anothers character. (I know that I didn't initialize > > the attacks. But fell right into the mindset.)- Basically, if you have > > to attack the person. You are emotional and not rational. > > > > In the time that I was absent from the list. I had time to do other > > things. Like spending some time with my family and do things around the > > house. > > > > Though, there is a possibility that I never signed off the list. I > > signed off the list and am at a loss to what conversations were vented. > > > > peace, > > > > Jim > > -- > > A real friend isn't someone you use once and then throw away. > > A real friend is someone you can use over and over again. > > > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, > visit: > > http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp > > > > > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: > http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp -- A man always needs to remember one thing about a beautiful woman. Somewhere, somebody's tired of her. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp