================================================ Subject: Re: NCR: ABSOLUTELY STUNNED - very long From: "Kevin L. Brown" To: Date: Tue 28 Aug 2001 16:17:53 -0700 ================================================ I never claimed not to have said those things. I claim that those things weren't said because he was discussing the merits of the two OSes. I said them because he was flat out making shit up about Microsoft that had been refuted repeatedly. ----- Original Message ----- From: "]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:45 PM Subject: Re: NCR: ABSOLUTELY STUNNED - very long > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kevin L. Brown > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:11 PM > Subject: Re: NCR: ABSOLUTELY STUNNED - very long > > > > > Check the archives... > > Nice editing job below. I can't tell who said what. I see one quote from > > me that was a one line reply but is mixed in with 3-4 other things that I > > didn't say. I'm not going to bother trying to decypher it. > > > > > so I guess this means that you'll be after her next. > > Wrong again. You can't post a false history and then make a conclusion. > > > > Here... we'll cover this part first, since it will about fill up the line > limit. > I was editing the histories, huh? Yep... I'm always known for that. Tell > you what. I am going to post all the kind and gentle things you have > mentioned to Jim the past few days. Then, to prove that I didn't edit the > histories, I will (on request) forward EACH AND EVERY source e-mail that the > statement was taken from. I also have a list of Keith and Kings... > Kevin... I suggest in the future before you call me a liar and state that I > "edit histories", that you check to make sure I don't have the originals > first. Especially since you're so hung up on "sources". > > FROM KEVIN > 8-28-01 12:41 AM > Perhaps you should try life in reality for a change. > 8-28-01 12:39 AM > You mean your Linux circle jerk crew? > 8-28-01 12:39 AM > You're too chicken shit to admit you were flat out lying about Microsoft > forcing people to upgrade their current OS. > Before someone could insult your integrity, you'd have to have some. > 8-27-01 1:24 AM > His Linux butt buddies didn't tell him about that part. > 8-27-01 1:24 AM > I knew you were a cowardly little man, but I didn't think you could actually > be so puny to be afraid of a bunch of 1s and 0s. > 8-25-01 2:16 AM > You've been shown to be naive at best and a flat out liar at worst. > 8-22-01 12:54 AM > Then quit posting your anti-Microsoft lies that you hear from your Linux > butt buddies. They're getting old. > > Basically, if you don't believe it. Fine!!! ... I'm tired of the > > credibility issues. > Yeah, I bet you are. Trying having some for a change. > > You can be a pioneer into other operating systems. Make your own, if you > > so choose. My choice is well known. > Yes. Ignorance. > 8-22-01 12:36 AM > > I guess ... > Constantly. > 8-20-01 9:41 PM > > Regardless, if I heard them verbally (by others comments) or a >reputable > source. > Verb. We need a verb for this to be a valid sentence. > > Kevin, there was talk about the MS-DOS file system. Mainly, the >people > that made that observation were on Linux chat rooms. > And probably with as valid a source to back it up as you have provided. > Other Linux whiners. > 8-19-01 10:45 PM > Bwock! Linux rocks, linux rocks, Jim wants a cracker, bwock! > 8-18-01 2:26 AM > Do you hit yourself in the head with a hammer then complain about headaches? > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: > http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp