================================================ Subject: Re: NCR: ABSOLUTELY STUNNED - very long From: "Kevin L. Brown" To: Date: Tue 28 Aug 2001 14:11:45 -0700 ================================================ ----- Original Message ----- From: "]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[" > And you can prove that he never saw a site with that info on it. Cool. I can prove that what he posted was a lie. Yet he refused to admit it and continued posting it as a lie. The first time he said it was forgivable. He may have read it somewhere and if he'd said "Oh, I read that somewhere. I guess it was wrong." then none of the ensuring discussion would've happened. But what he did was the opposite, he continued posting that lie and even added on a few more. > Actually, we (Jim and I) were having a decent conversation about Linux > versus Windows, when compaired to the needs we were after in an operating > system. Windows didn't have what either of us wanted, so we chose to look > to Linux, which did. From there, the attacks began, Wrong. > Yep... So much about your accusation of us not knowing who posted it. > I guess you would > have had to have been following the private conversation Then why are you upset? You take a private Office XP conversation public and insert it into the middle of a Windows XP discussion and then get upset when people point out it's not about Windows XP? > Check the archives... Nice editing job below. I can't tell who said what. I see one quote from me that was a one line reply but is mixed in with 3-4 other things that I didn't say. I'm not going to bother trying to decypher it. > > Why? Has she started posting lies about the employer of someone on the > > list? > I don't know... she has said in the past that Microsoft has some problems... As have I. As has Debbi. But we can enumerate them and back them up with sources. We don't make up things and then claim we read it somewhere. > Jim talked about flaws and he was attacked... Again, revisionist history. He talked about flaws in a marketing strategy that didn't exist. > so I guess this means that you'll be after her next. Wrong again. You can't post a false history and then make a conclusion. > Reminds me of that KKK group that you were accusing Jackson of being a part > of. More revisionist history. I said he was demonstrating the same characteristics as that group. And that that group was based in the town he said was mostly bias-free. > Actually, he asked some valid questions about such things as the Kernal that > XP will be running on... and even got some respectable answers... > then people started to cut him down again You just proved my point. When he talked actual issues, people talked to him decently. When he then reverted into mindless bashing, he got attacked. Boo-fucking-hoo. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp