================================================ Subject: Re: NCR: ABSOLUTELY STUNNED From: "Keith P. Mears" To: Date: Tue 28 Aug 2001 19:52:21 -0500 ================================================ You're missing a vital point, Scott. Had my "accusations" been taken SERIOUSLY, I would certainly expect Jim to lash out, tell me to STFU, anything like that, and if it came to light that Jim actually DID have any problems like I "accused" him of having, I would have been the first to make a formal public apology. However, Jim himself chose to IGNORE the remarks and see them for what they were: a particularly cutting remark that had no REAL relevance and therefore merited no reply. And for the record, I was not "accusing" Jim of anything, simply using a decidedly nasty line of attack to try and make a point. To any whom my actions have offended (other than Jim, with whom I have already spoken), I offer my apologies. > And as I added before, are you able to prove that Jim in fact did not ever > read anything like that? And even if he didn't, does that then make it > right to call him a drug user? > But I'm guessing that no matter what is said here, it's okay for Keith and > Kevin and King to cut down on whomever they want, but those people aren't > allowed to lash back. Thanks for making that clear. > > ¤]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[¤ To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp