================================================ Subject: Re: NCR: ABSOLUTELY STUNNED - very long From: "Keith P. Mears" To: Date: Tue 28 Aug 2001 18:00:06 -0500 ================================================ > Umm... how about Keith slipping in (after dropping the topic, and supposedly > moving on from attacks on Jim) "If it weren't for the fact that the excerpt > you posted was correctly punctuated (I'm tellin' ya, I just LOVE Mail > Rules!), I'd be tempted to think Jimbo wrote it himself.". When was that > posted? The 26th at 10:05 PM. You consider that moving on? > Or "The only public things I remember "hearing" were the damn tabloid > headlines, and I trust those about as much as I trust Jimbo's opinions to be > based in fact.". The 26th at 8:11 PM. In a post about Mariah Carey > possibly being in a form of rehab. > Shall I continue? Feel free to continue, Scott, but next time try using my statements in the same context in which they were originally posted (i.e., a joke between me and "my clique"). You'll notice at some point today that I replied to Tara and "owned" the first three insults she retrieved from the archive, statements which were made directly to Jim, but you'll also notice that when it became apparent to me that I WAS going too far in my comments, I stopped. And as you'll read in my reply to Tara, you'll notice the differentiation between my insults and Jim's. Am I a biased source? Sure, but I think the differentiation would stand true whether I myself make the distinction, or if it came from an unbiased source such as yourself (not that I expect you to make such a differentiation, but I think you understand what I'm getting at). And I'll also admit that the comments I made, whether in reply to Jim, or to "my clique", don't really have any place on the list, but then again, neither did my comments regarding ANY lister's anatomy, and those went pretty well unremarked. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp