================================================ Subject: Re: NCR: ABSOLUTELY STUNNED From: "Debbi R" To: Date: Tue 28 Aug 2001 15:38:01 -0700 ================================================ And how much did I post after that? Here's something HE posted (the stuff he attached was regarding OfficeXP): ********************************** -----Original Message----- From: Creed Discussion List [mailto:CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM] On Behalf Of Creed - 7M3 - Live Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:10 PM To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM Subject: Safety First... Admission, after the info It is great for Keith to admit. When he is wrong. However, I haven't found any information to indicate me being incorrect. ***************************************** My reply to that was: ************************ Jim, don't make me go thru the archives. You said that Microsoft was going to require people to sign subscriptions contracts for Windows XP then FORCE them to upgrade at their discretion. You haven't even come close to proving that assertion. You've backpedaled to the point of "microsoft is pushing subscription sales model for office XP" Nice try. ***************************** Then he asked for his original post, which I sent. Following that was his posting from the anti-microsoft privacy groups and that thread. My point, Scott, is that I didn't continue bashing him about it after he posted that. The only time the subject was brought up by me was in response to something he said. > -----Original Message----- > From: ]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[ [mailto:NightStorm_Draco_@hotmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:19 PM > To: creedlvr@LAFORNARA.COM; CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM > Subject: Re: Re: NCR: ABSOLUTELY STUNNED > > > > Well Debbi, I found what you were looking for. And so as to > avoid Kevin accusing me of editing histories, which I admit I > did with this one (I cut out the part where Jim mentions a > problem with mspexe), I have left the header intact, so that > you can go and find the original in your archive too. As you > can see, he admitted to the possibility of being wrong, and > although it isn't a full admittance (since, as I have kept > saying, there is no way to know for sure what he has and > hasn't read in the past), it IS what you asked for up there. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp