================================================ Subject: Re: Origins ... From: "creed -7m3 - live" To: Date: Sat 25 Aug 2001 04:21:07 -0400 ================================================ Sure, send me the full posting. The posting states "I imagine" = (seems to me, guess, as far as I know) The post also states that I suppose (It seems to me) I believe that I ought to look for the .NET, instead of XP. Since the description sounds like the .NET concept. But, as far as 8/8 - I would guess that I really didn't think that MS had two different systems in the works. It might be interesting to search for the .NET progress and what it entails. So I imagined and supposed something and my credibility and brain capacity were questioned. Thanks for the excerpt. At least I have a date for the search for the post. Plus know that I did not say that the comments were rock solid and indisputable facts. Jim On Sat, 2001-08-25 at 03:15, Debbi R wrote: > Allow me: > > In your post of 8/8 at 11:18 you said: (and if you'd like a copy of the > whole post, I'll send it offline) > > "The XP system is supposed to be a network oriented system that you are > supposed to have to buy updates. I also heard these things on tech > related news sites and discussion groups.So i imagine that XP is a rent > and never buy OS. Where you have contractual obligations to upgrade." > > > The fact is that you haven't posted anything that backs up your claim. > Post your fucking sources or shut the fuck up, Jim. I'm sick of > listening to you bash Microsoft with nothing but the null air space > between your ears. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Creed Discussion List > > [mailto:CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM] On Behalf Of creed -7m3 - live > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:57 PM > > To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM > > Subject: Re: Origins ... > > > > > > My sources haven't been ripped to shreds. Since the Microsoft > > idea for charging for software. On a subscription basis were > > correct. Though the XP operating system was not marked as > > having a subscription option. > > > > But, the fact that there is so much in the way of > > discrediting my comments about the issue and my overall > > credibility are reasons for me to persist with the discussion. > > > > About looking up the sources. Before I make a post. I don't > > think that my job is to be a reporter with disclosed sources > > and references. > > > > Naive or a liar!!!! I hardly think so!!!!!! > > > > Send me the original post. Since I empty my send mail > > occasionally and don't have the "source". > > > > For you to think that any 12 year old child would think that > > the scheme regarding subscriptions and forced upgrades, to > > not being legitimate. I hardly think that the case would be > > there. Look how much deflection has been given towards saying > > it was XP Office. (Different animal, but same > > outcome.) > > > > I'll be quiet about the whole SW issue. But, to reference > > personal attacks about things related to my search attempts > > or dictionary references. I needed to bring up the related topic. > > > > Jim > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: > http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp -- Where am I? Who am I? Am I? I To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp