================================================ Subject: Safety First... Admission after the info From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" To: Date: Wed 22 Aug 2001 00:10:12 -0400 ================================================ It is great for Keith to admit. When he is wrong. However, I haven't found any information to indicate me being incorrect. Since the issue seems to be that I will not admit to being wrong. Here is another piece to the puzzle. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft, however, is pushing its new subscription model Software Assurance (SA) program. The software giant expects more than 50 percent of its customers to sign up. Subscribing to SA costs 29 percent of the end-user price per year and gives subscribers the right to all upgrades of Office. To be eligible a customer needs to run the current version of the product. Only Office XP will be the current version on Oct. 1, so the customer first needs to upgrade. Once the cost of the four-year SA contract is added onto the cost of the software upgrade, users end up paying a premium of 66 percent, the NGN calculated. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I again know that the information regards XP office. But, the bits are seeming to indicate that the issues that I posted were pretty darn credible. I read a subscription as regarding to pay as you go. If predictions are that 50 percent of the customers will sign up. Isn't that like saying that the pay up, or off you go scenerio that I mentioned in my earlier postings? The best way to kill an issue is to not keep posting to the list that inspires responses. Basically, if you don't believe it. Fine!!! ... I'm tired of the credibility issues. Especially, since the issues regarding sheep were discussed. for those that follow the subscription scheme. Be aware of what some seem to like to do to the poor defenseless sheep. You can be a pioneer into other operating systems. Make your own, if you so choose. My choice is well known. Sorry if I took the comment as more than it was meant to be. The part between two ----- above are excerpts from this link. http://windows2000.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://iwsun4.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/01/05/25/010525hnfight.xml ambelina wrote: > HELL OF A GUY TO ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG!!! > LV > Amb > > "Keith P. Mears" wrote: > > >>Thanks Amb. I did notice in the FAQ I posted that the Church has withdrawn >>ALL endorsement of polygamy. I regret making my rash "widely practiced" >>statement, and I'd like to thank Debbi for calling bullshit and forcing me >>to fins the facts. >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "ambelina" >>To: >>Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:56 PM >>Subject: to go with Keith's polygamy. >> >> >>>I found this at lds.org go to search then confrence talks. >>>Lv >>>Amb >>>(and by the way I live in Utah and DO NOT practice Polygamy!!!) >>>There are very few Poligamists here BUT they are the ones that give Utah >>>a bad name!! >>> >>> >>>To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, >>> >>visit: >> >>>http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp >>> >>> >>> >>To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: >>http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp >> > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: > http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp > > -- "Bureaucracy is the enemy of innovation." -- Mark Shepherd, former President and CEO of Texas Instruments To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp