================================================ Subject: Re: Was - Another one for Win2K and NT users.. Now - Virus != Hacker From: "Keith P. Mears" To: Date: Sun 12 Aug 2001 01:22:22 -0500 ================================================ BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Debbi R" To: Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:09 PM Subject: Re: Was - Another one for Win2K and NT users.. Now - Virus != Hacker > "So the name should be NT5." > > Clue phone: It's not. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Creed - 7M3 - Live [mailto:creed7m3live@columbus.rr.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:10 PM > To: creedlvr@LAFORNARA.COM > Cc: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM > Subject: Re: Was - Another one for Win2K and NT users.. Now - Virus != > Hacker > > > Windows 2000 is based on the NT4 kernel. So the name should be NT5. > > If windows 2000 uses the NTFS, instead of the VFAT32 file system. It > is actually the next version of NT. Which would be version 5. > > Someone informed me that NT5 was what they were going to call it. > > I guess that since it is called Windows 2000. It should be based on the > 95 kernel. But, since it was called Windows 2000. I guess I will call it > > Windows 2000. It is their trademark and thier choice from the "OS naming > > book" > > I think that ME is based on the Windows 95 kernel. But I could be > mistaken. > > I'll call the versions by thier MS selected names. > > Jim > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: > http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp