================================================ Subject: Re: Backing up the XP subcribers a bit. Links to source. From: "Keith P. Mears" To: Date: Sun 12 Aug 2001 22:12:35 -0500 ================================================ Well, to FURTHER illustrate that you have NO IDEA what you're talking about, I upgraded to WinXP today, at NO CHARGE. And of all the applications I use, ONE was listed as "Possibly not compatible with XP". As my good luck would have it, it IS compatible. > Free isn't so much an issue, as it is the issue of eXtreme Pricing. > Why get an upgraded OS, when all of your previously bought software will > not work on it correctly. > Well DUH. Who WOULDN'T rather have a free system? This is quite possibly the least intelligent statement I've seen from you Jim, and that's really saying something, considering your most recent rash of sourceless "Windows info". > I would rather have a free system. Where each vendor (or supplier, being > it is free), also upgrades key applications that are supplied in thier > distributions. If a change is made, usually the programs recieve a > timely upgrade. > An exception to a timely upgrade of a critical OS change was Real Audio, > (when Redhat went from version 5.2 to version 6.0.) But there was no > such problem that I have seen, since that time. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp