================================================ Subject: Re: Was - Another one for Win2K and NT users.. Now - Virus != Hacker From: "]\\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[" To: Date: Tue 7 Aug 2001 17:10:14 -0400 ================================================ Sure... okay, whatever Kevin. Just be sure to pass the bottle down the line when you're done. I have neither claimed Linux to be better nor worse... that seems to be a hang-up that you have alone there. If you want to get into that discussion, why not go back to trying to start an argument with Jim? And by "us" I take it you're referring to you and your imaginary friends? Or are you a little to deep with the "English Discussion" taking place and are starting to act a bit more like the Queen with each reply (us = plural... and I doubt you're so big that you count as several people)? Lets cover what I have said... 1. I am considering switching to a dual-boot Linux/Windows because of the number of virii running rampant out there that only affect Microsoft Operating Systems 2. There are 2 new ones going around that only affect Win2K and WinNT 3. Several of the list members only check their mail from work, and a lot of those computers run either Win2K or WinNT OS 4. A real hacker doesn't need a virus or Trojan to access a person's computer 5. A "hacker" that uses one of the 2 mentioned above is actually considered a cracker, a wannabe, or a lamer 6. I covered again that the majority of well-known and malicious worms and virus out there are strictly for Windows, which would make a Linux system immune 7. I made a request for an old joke that was going around in circulation on the list a little over a year ago (but you, being new to the list, would not know about that) 8. That your attempt to start an argument is pointless, because I was originally agreeing with what you said I hope that this about covers any delusional things you may have stated in an attempt to piss me off, and in the future, if you want to reply to something I say, at least spend the extra couple of seconds and use a little brainpower to read what I actually type, instead of skimming it, and translating it into your own wording. Nice chatting with ya... ¤]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[¤ http://NightStorm.isyourgod.com/ NightStorm_Draco_@hotmail.com NightStorm_Draco@creedlist.com NightStorm@isyourgod.com I've seen the wicked fruit of your vine, Destroy the man who lacks a strong mind Human pride sings a vengeful song Inspired by the times you've been walked on My stage is shared by many millions, Who lift their hands up high because they feel this We are one We are strong, The more you hold us down the more we press on What if you did? What if you lied? What if I avenge? What if eye for an eye? ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin L. Brown To: Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:00 PM Subject: Re: Was - Another one for Win2K and NT users.. Now - Virus != Hacker > I can only read as far as the actual statements. If you intended to > actually claim that Linux has fewer viruses and worms than Windows because > it's an inferior product, then you should've said that the first time. > Because what you said leads us to believe you thought the opposite. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[" > > What the hell are you talking about??? > > Whatever drugs they have you on, I suggest you request a lower dose from > > them, cause it's affecting your thought pattern. > > I never once said that, or anything close. I said that you don't see near > > as many virii designed for Linux and you do for Windows... you brought up > > hackers not needing a virus to access a system, and I agreed. > > I suggest that in the future, if you wish to start an argument, you read > > further into what someone says first to make sure that there really is a > > conflict of interest. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp