================================================ Subject: Re: Was - Another one for Win2K and NT users.. Now - Virus != Hacker From: "Kevin L. Brown" To: Date: Tue 7 Aug 2001 14:00:36 -0700 ================================================ I can only read as far as the actual statements. If you intended to actually claim that Linux has fewer viruses and worms than Windows because it's an inferior product, then you should've said that the first time. Because what you said leads us to believe you thought the opposite. ----- Original Message ----- From: "]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[" > What the hell are you talking about??? > Whatever drugs they have you on, I suggest you request a lower dose from > them, cause it's affecting your thought pattern. > I never once said that, or anything close. I said that you don't see near > as many virii designed for Linux and you do for Windows... you brought up > hackers not needing a virus to access a system, and I agreed. > I suggest that in the future, if you wish to start an argument, you read > further into what someone says first to make sure that there really is a > conflict of interest. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp