================================================ Subject: Re: Multi-windozed From: "Jon" To: Date: Tue 7 Aug 2001 20:04:13 -0700 ================================================ I like how you place blame on Microsoft for all of that. Tell you what -- instead of boring the other folks on this list with a running tally, I'll let you pick out the ones you've violated: http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/toc.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:45 PM Subject: Re: Multi-windozed > I still use Win 95 at work. NT4 has problems with running M$ products > correctly. With M$ 2000. It is incompatible to run some of our software > on at even a greater extent. > My point is that no none is seeing the need to buy XP or NT5. So windoze > is not going to support it's other Windoze versions. Their tactic is to > force people to use piss out more money to buy an incompatiblized > operating system.Since the NT5 kernel is incompatible with earlier > windoze kernels. > My hope is that people will get tired of paying for worthless upgrades > and migrate to free operating systems that are improved and shared with > others. Where there is no cost for the bug fixes. > > > Of course they're going to be discontinued. Like Windows 2.0 was. Like > > Windows 95 was. They are all eventually discontinued. > > If you have windows 3.0, you have ceased to have your compatible > > applications maintained. > > > > > > Your first claim: Microsoft is forcing you to upgrade. > > Your second claim: No one is using NT5. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp