================================================ Subject: Re: Odp: RE: Survey 1 of 2 From: "Kevin L. Brown" To: Date: Sat 4 Aug 2001 12:20:10 -0700 ================================================ What's bigoted about "the Hispanic-types"? What's bigoted about "or face the inevitable future"? What's bigoted about the way you used "Anglo" in other messages? I only hope some day you realize how this sounds. There never was a nation of "Texas" post-secession. The US never recognized it so it never existed. So the "one nation secedes question is meritless. No basis as it didn't happen. I'm not sure where you got your "descendent" definition of Texian. http://lonestar.texas.net/~dwatson/blanco/tx_hist.htm TEXIAN (tek'se-an) adj. A citizen or the culture of the Texas section of the province of Coahuila y Texas, Republic of Mexico or the subsequent Republic of Texas. Note that the province of Coahuila y Texas nor the Republic of Texas haven't existed for over 100 years. There hasn't been a Texian in over 100 years. The almanac of Texas even dropped the term 120 years ago. I especially find it semi-pathetic that you're proud of being a "Texian" (which is in reality based in Mexican heritage) while at the same time expressing chagrin at "the Hispanic-types" invading. But I guess that's the way someone who longs for the days of killing "invading Mexicans" expresses themselves. "We should strengthen immigration laws at least tenfold". ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jackson Crawford" To: Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Odp: RE: Survey 1 of 2 > Interesting point about the secession not being recognized. Very > interesting in particulat because I hadn't thought of it from that angle, > although, and this really is a question and not just a rhetorical point, if > one nation decides to secede from another, should the laws of the nation > from which the secession is being performed be considered valid? > Yeah, that "suspicious military presence" was sort of a joke, but an uncle > of mine wanted me to include it. Thanks for the explanation though, it makes > sense and I'm gonna have to try it on him. > Unfortunately, yes, the border is rather "open." It's not the way that we'd > like to see it, but the damned corporations just love that cheap Mexican > labor, so nothing happens. In my opinion we should have a fuckin' military > base along the border (more for the intimidation value than any thing else). > Yes, it does seem that the Hispanic-types are beginning to outnumber us > Anglo-types, they already comprise about 40% of the population (most of them > are illegal). We should strengthen immigration laws at least tenfold or face > the inevitable future. > A Texian is defined as a descendant of a Texas Independence War veteran, > yes all of those veterans are dead but their progeny keep the title. > And what's bigoted about any of this? > > Rock on, > > Jackson Wade Crawford - the Raven of Texas/ Corvvs Texanis/ se Hraefn of > Texase/ Kruk Teksasu/ der Rabe von Texas/ el Cuervo de Tejas/ le Corbeau du > Texas > International Director, Corvist Association for the Preservation and > Perpetuation of Free Will > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: > http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp