================================================ Subject: Re: NCR: Temptation From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" To: Date: Wed 25 Jul 2001 23:25:37 -0400 ================================================ Keith, I guess I came off wrong. The attacking someone personally was more of a general statement. But to take Mad's place on the list. I don't think I'd try to do. Of all the rules and regulations. I feel that the personal attack on someone's personal character is a rule to aid in civility. I could take the comparison to Mad as a compliment or something besides one.I have always been able to talk civil in discussions with Mad. Even when it came down to political conversations. That is what i wasd trying to get across. You don't have to agree with another's point of view. But it is possible to express views with each other and have a progressive debate. Instead of one that goes off into other topics. Like this topic was about someone putting a sweet in arms reach of a child. Expecting the child to not go for it. My temptation comment was about that situation happening until you pass on. The candy just comes in different packages. Jim Keith Mears wrote: > Ummm, let me see, when did I resort to a personal attack of any nature. > Because I carried forward a line of April's as a further joke? I don't > remember HER taking any serious offense to it, and if she did, I have > already apologized to her personally. > > Besides, when did you take Mad's place as the list moderator? -- When I'm gone, boxing will be nothing again. The fans with the cigars and the hats turned down'll be there, but no more housewives and little men in the street and foreign presidents. It's goin' to be back to the fighter who comes to town, smells a flower, visits a hospital, blows a horn and says he's in shape. Old hat. I was the onliest boxer in history people asked questions like a senator. -- Muhammad Ali To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp