================================================ Subject: Re: Faith vs. Hardwood floors From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" To: Date: Sat 14 Jul 2001 21:50:26 -0400 ================================================ I'm not referring to Faith on Hardwood floors. But to taking it to the carpet. Now, after putting the subject back to Faith again. I'll take it back to what I really wanted to say. The only thing that gets done from posting private arguments is that you get a lot of people to have to decide if this list is worth staying on. I mean, I read over 200 mails and found little to be worthy of reply to. Jon, I feel what you wrote on this message is great. But the two postings between each other are just too bothersome. For those that post just to cause public argument. I think that they should consider the effect that you are having on the membership of the list and on detracting from a good aspect of the list. I haven't checked the amount of members yet. But I'd imagine a lot have already left the bickering. Please keep in mind that this is a discussion list. Not a stone walled petty argument list. Thanks in Advance, Jim Jon wrote: > Admittedly, Kevin is continuing to bait her into conflict. I can only > surmise why -- I assume it's an unhappy experience in life. However, he > has stated repeatedly in his mails what he had said before. Jess has > either taken bits of his mails or has come darn close to just out and > out making things up to counter what he's saying. > > > > My sentence was in regard to a nice little private mail I got from Jess > who did not permit me the benefit of a response because she 'blocked' > me. I managed to send my reply anyway, but I find it childish that > someone would make a comment as she did and then not be adult enough to > accept a retort, regardless of the maturity content of that retort. > > > > Am I looking at her posts with biased eyes? Possibly. There are quite > a few of her posts that don't merit a response, but what she's doing in > purposely taking Kevin's messages out of context and should be called on > the carpet because of that. > -- Adam was but human--this explains it all. He did not want the apple for the apple's sake, he wanted it only because it was forbidden. The mistake was in not forbidding the serpent; then he would have eaten the serpent. -- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar" To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp