================================================ Subject: Re: A Compromise From: To: Date: Thu 12 Jul 2001 10:41:13 -0400 ================================================ Is it just me or does it seem that all of a sudden we have a moderator on here? LOL Just kiddin Mad, don't take offense it was just a joke! ~Michele Mad4creedsmbs@AOL.COM wrote: >You are getting all bent out of shape over the wrong conversation...I am >referring to a conversation about two or three weeks ago that was solely >between two people and it involved over 70 posts to the List. > >As for V...I do not recall her ever taking part in a two person conversation >on the List...she would be the first one to take it off the List. > >You are missing the point...music related, Creed related, nonsense >related...if it interests many people and quite a few listers are taking part >in the thread (as the one you were just talking about), then I have no >problem...its the 75 posts between two people that tick me off. > >How about a compromise...when someone feels the absolute need to have a >private conversation on the List, and they feel that it would violate their >first amendment rights to take it off the List, how about just changing the >subject line to someting like "Private Conversation" and that way those of us >who are not interested can just delete the post without having to open it to >see what it's about. > >While we are on the subject of subject lines...can we make an effort to >change it when the subject of the thread changes??? > >Does that sound fair to all??? > >-Mad > >In a message dated 7/11/01 8:30:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, >NightStorm_Draco_@hotmail.com writes: > > >> rue, Mad... but if the conversation hadn't have been on the list (when it >> started it was between Lisa and Ross), then keith would have never been able >> to join... then I wouldn't have been able to join in on it (which I was >> thankful for, since I couldn't do anything else, with a very sick kid to >> take care of)... and Debbi couldn't have joined in. Oh wait... wasn't this >> the same conversation where we had meaningful topics and actually got to >> KNOW each other better? Yeah, I guess we could have done without that, >> couldn't we? I recall MANY conversations between 2 or 3 people in the >> past... they were never shot down then... why now all of a sudden you feel >> it neccesary to tell us to not have a conversation? If V was one of the >> people participating in the discussion, which a lot of times had nothing to >> do with Creed, or even music (as she had done many times in the past), would >> you have STILL told us that we aren't allowed to do it and we were wrong? >> Of couse, she would probably tell you the same thing that everyone else has >> been... get over it and let things go as they are, instead of trying to fuel >> a fight. Oh, and to point something out... a good chunk of the "private >> conversation" that night was about music... oh, and Creed. But I guess we >> were still wrong to have it, weren't we? >> >> ¤]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[¤ (who is sick of having people say that a discussion list >> is no place for a discussion) >> > > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp