Re: I spent two hours with Scott today!

From: "Keith Mears" <kthulu@COMTECK.COM>
To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM>
Date: Wed
11 Jul 2001 19:40:24 -0500

If only there were a way to have an email client sort by subject or name to make deleting easier.  Or better yet, if you could somehow tell the client to delete mails from certain people or mails with certain words in the subject line.  That would make this whole problem go away for you.
 
Oh wait.  you can already do that
----- Original Message -----
From: Mad4creedsmbs@AOL.COM
To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: I spent two hours with Scott today!

Jim, I know we can;t talk about Creed all the time...if you remember, that
was a battle I often led...but my concern is that there is almost no mention
of Creed on the Creed List anymore.  I realize that they are just now going
into the studios and there may not be a great deal to discuss, but it seems
to me that anytime someone mentions anything about Creed, the thread is
responded to by maybe two or three people and then it dies...unless of course
someone fines someting to argue about within that post, then it is responded
to by thirty people.

My point is that it doesn't make any sense!  

BTW...I have no idea what "PS - Read the fortune" means??

-Mad

In a message dated 7/10/01 11:23:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
creed7m3live@columbus.rr.com writes:


Mad,

We have responded to the post in a positive way. as well as with
opposing opinions. I posted positive about the organization. WAWOF.
Others brought up other points that enhanced a better view. Negative
comments sometimes reinforce blindly positive posts.

I enjoyed reading the post from you and have replied to it.
For the most part. I think that we are all just Creed fans that venture
to extremes. But as a VIPCREED lister. You are aware what happens when
someone wants a hundred percent Creed list and all friendship
conversations are halted.

Plus another reason why some people are not getting an accurate view of
the list is that they filter too many people. Then they don't get a
realistic view of the unadultered version of the list is.


BTW - I agree with your points below. But if a subject is strong enough.
I think that it will stand the tribulations of bickering.


Later,

Jim Cornette

PS - Read the fortune.