================================================ Subject: Sucess by WAWO (POP crowd) From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" To: Date: Thu 5 Jul 2001 20:13:47 -0400 ================================================ In RE: >>I am glad that the Internet promotion helped them make it this far in >>popularity.Even though I wonder how HC outsold MOP by what it >>did.Since I think that MOP had a longer amount of "staying power" to >>it. At least in my case. since MOP made it in my CD player for well >>over a year and HC for less than a year. Ross Johnson wrote: >>>> > I think it can all be put down to the slightly poppy > sounding wawo. that opened them to a brand new > audience (IMO) > > Mr Mungo, digging everclear a lot at the mo Jim Wrote: I believe that you are right by the numbers for album sales and talking to Passive POP music listeners. The only songs that they talk about usually are Higher and WAWO. The Internet is what made me more interested in Creed's music.Talking to others on the list through the time has changed my views on issues related to MP3's and bootlegs though. That with the long breaks between the musicians having albums released. I know a lot of the lag between albums is due to the record companies though. I've heard information from bands that the record companies stall the release dates and prolong their chances to put out good music that they already have perfected. In other things: I heard on the radio today that AC/DC's current singer is going to go back to his original band mates. after they complete thier tour. I'm wondering if the band will pursue another (hopefully more Bonn Scott type singer, except for the alcohol problem) Again, I would of liked to of seen more Creed albums out, rather than one every two years. I know that I bought all of the AC/DC albums from 74 jailbreak to Back in Black. The only post Bonn album that I bought (other than Back In Black) was Stiff Upper Lip. It was OK. But the others were better with Bonn. They were more fun to sing along with. What do you all think they'll do? Jim -- Windows 95 Beer: A lot of people have taste-tested it and claim it's wonderful. The can looks a lot like Mac Beer's can, but tastes more like Windows 3.1 Beer. It comes in 32-oz. cans, but when you look inside, the cans only have 16 oz. of beer in them. Most people will probably keep drinking Windows 3.1 Beer until their friends try Windows 95 Beer and say they like it. The ingredients list, when you look at the small print, has some of the same ingredients that come in DOS beer, even though the manufacturer claims that this is an entirely new brew. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp