================================================ Subject: Re: died in dreams???? ..... the recurring dream...... From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" To: Date: Sun 6 May 2001 22:20:21 -0400 ================================================ Tommy, I personally don't remember any recurring dreams myself. Most of mine are about 10 minutes long and pretty much shift to another theme. I'm glad that you survived the maulings and stuff in your dreams. It might be because you didn't believe in the superstition for it to apply. Just as others said earlier. About the mauling from an animal in real life. I'd hope that it doesn't really happen in the concrete world. Good luck, Jim - Tommy C. wrote: > Speaking of recurring dreams......has anyone had a dream that picks up > where it left off the night before for about a week and a half or so? > One of my friends thought she was nuts after that happened to her. :) > > > > Died in dreams? I've been both maimed and mauled by an animal of some > sort in my dreams, and awoke fine the next morning. But then again I > don't believe that if you die in your dreams, you die in life. So > maybe it could go back to the whole "believing" thing. Or maybe these > dreams are trying to tell us something, kind of a clairvoyant > experience. (I watch too many movies) :) I sure hope I don't get > mauled by a small animal of some sort anytime soon. :) lol > > > > Hopper (*_*) > > *Thinks this disussion has brought out some interesting points > throughout the group* > -- Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. There are many examples of outsiders who eventually overthrew entrenched scientific orthodoxies, but they prevailed with irrefutable data. More often, egregious findings that contradict well-established research turn out to be artifacts. I have argued that accepting psychic powers, reincarnation, "cosmic conciousness," and the like, would entail fundamental revisions of the foundations of neuroscience. Before abandoning materialist theories of mind that have paid handsome dividends, we should insist on better evidence for psi phenomena than presently exists, especially when neurology and psychology themselves offer more plausible alternatives. - Barry L. Beyerstein, "The Brain and Conciousness: Implications for Psi Phenomena", The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, ppg. 163-171 To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp