================================================ Subject: Re: Creedquest From: "Joe Earles" To: Date: Thu 14 Feb 2002 20:36:27 -0500 ================================================ > So in other words you're telling me to ignore who I am and conform to > everyone else's social standards. This is not a list where everything has > to be critiqued. This is supposed to be a friendly list where people can > just go and talk with fellow Creed members in a friendly fashion. Yeah. So why don't you try it sometime and get off my back? > you're acting like a pretentious ass. Pretentious? Moi? (The right people will get that one...) ;-) > I never asked for a computer tech, I just had a problem on a Creed site I > though someone could help me with. You presume too much. Thank you, Natalie Portman. > I never claimed to be a hero. Other people email the list wanting to vent > about other things that go on in their lives, so I do and apparently it's a > sin. No, just an annoyance. > I don't mind if people IM me and want to talk about Creed > or any other music for that matter. There is no harm in someone IMing you. > Now, but in your statement here, it appears as if you're referring to the > other list members as "riff raff," as you so eloquently put it. Yeah. there's quite a bit here as a matter of fact. Then there are the folks that have it all together and there's a good handful of those too. You, I'd say, would fall into category A. > Apparently > you're too good to have other Creed members talk to you directly. Other > than the fact that I completed disputed your claim that I thought I was too > good for this list,I see you completed avoided my reply. I didn't "avoid" anything. I just couldn't come up with anything quippier than "I disagree" so I figured, 'who'd want to read THAT?' > I know it was a childish (or puerile) question. That's why I referred to it > as a "stupid question." Other people asked the question before when Creed > Quest first started. The only difference between then and now is the fact > the I never had the opportunity to participate in the game because I am so > busy all of time. Just because I asked a stupid question, you assume I'm an > idiot and lazy. Uh-huh. Mama always said, "Stupid is as stupid does." > You presume too much about me considering the fact It's deja vu all over again! > that you don't know anything about me, my life, or circumstances that I may > live in. And tonight before I go to bed I'll say a prayer and thank my walking upright God for that. > Other than the fact the I'm 19, pay the bills for my parents house > (whom both are deceased, and if I don't want to live on the streets, I have > to pay the bills), I am putting myself through college, and struggle with my > own personal problems I would rather keep to myself at the moment (no, this > is not a sob story or me trying to portray myself as a victim, just stating > facts about my life after you pressume I'm stupid and lazy). Gee for someone who doesn't want to get into any personal issues about himself you sure did manage to drop a couple real juicy morsels just then... > Actually, I remember that whole feud you had going on with that girl a while > back, and at the time, I was one of your supporters. Maybe you have people > stalking you because you come off rather rude to them, I mean after all, you > do pretty much sit on your high horse, insult others, and make assumptions > about those people despite the fact you don't know them. What can I say? The harvest is RIPE! Oh, and I'd feel better NOT having you as one of my "supporters." Now I'm trying to figure out when it was I ever ran for office and had "supporters"?? > Wait a second, you > said she made uncalled for comments and assumptions about you despite the > fact she didn't know you. That's sounds familiar. Let me think for a second > . . . . Oh yeah, that's what you are doing to me. Listen, luser, you never saw one of those e-mails that was sent to me. You have no clue what kind of hurtful things little miss manic depressive had to say to me and I suggest that you secure that line of pseudo-logic. Now. That is unless you'd LIKE me to treat you on the same level in which case I'd be glad to give you a demonstration. > As for other people > patting you on the back, the mere fact that you mention that makes one think > you need others to vindicate yourself and your views. No, but it's nice to know that not everyone out there is as anal retentive as you. And I point it out because you have the nerve to paint ME as the bad guy. I'm the one that people agree with. You should see what some of the messages in my inbox are saysing about YOU right now.... > Another thing is > maybe people agree with you for the sake they don't feel like arguing with > such a pompous ass. Doubtful. They just know when they're outgunned in the wit and intelligence categories so they smartly choose not to bother. > No, I wouldn't accept an apology from you. Why? I > just answered that question. And *I'm* the one up on a high horse... okay. Well, in the plus column I guess that if I get a nosebleed up here I can come to you for advice on how to treat it... To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp