================================================ Subject: Re: Personal attacks again. ... From: "Debbi" To: Date: Mon 4 Feb 2002 19:54:32 -0800 ================================================ Nobody has mentioned OE's spell checker being broken after an upgrade - the one person who did mention it followed up her post by saying that she'd failed to enable the feature when she upgraded. Try again. -----Original Message----- From: Creed Discussion List [mailto:CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM] On Behalf Of Creed - 7M3 - Live Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:53 PM To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM Subject: Re: Personal attacks again. ... I cannot understand, how the Outlook Express 6, can be considered 'third party software". Windows XP is not related to Outlook Express 6? Anyway, I use Ximian's Evolution. But only for the Ximian/ RedHat mutt distro. The spellchecker works fine, with that program. Plus, the program looks and works similar to Outlook. Except for the need for dlls. It even works for MSExchange accounts. Usually, I use mozilla, without a spellchecker. I like the way, that the multiple accounts, can be kept seperate. Instead of all being dumped into one inbox. Which is the way that Outlook and Evolution work, by default. Debbi wrote: > jim, try reading for comprehension sometime. You're talking about the > fact that third party software companies put registry keys and entries > in a place that's not an industry standard and where windows xp won't > look for them. Why? because they're not in the right place. Explain > how that's microsoft's fault. Use both sides of the paper if > necessary When you're done, STFU because you bore me. > > > > and for the record, that was my opinion, not a personal attack - hence > the "it's clear to me". Not my fault if some of the rest of the list > is * blind*, IN MY OPINION. > I won't worry too much about your next postings. Just don't boast about your misconceptions of others, on the list. I have no real problems with you. I just cannot understand certain aspects of your personality. Nor the rationality behind your perceptions of other people. Jim -- So Richard and I decided to try to catch [the small shark]. With a great deal of strategy and effort and shouting, we managed to maneuver the shark, over the course of about a half-hour, to a sort of corner of the lagoon, so that it had no way to escape other than to flop up onto the land and evolve. Richard and I were inching toward it, sort of crouched over, when all of a sudden it turned around and -- I can still remember the sensation I felt at that moment, primarily in the armpit area -- headed right straight toward us. Many people would have panicked at this point. But Richard and I were not "many people." We were experienced waders, and we kept our heads. We did exactly what the textbook says you should do when you're unarmed and a shark that is nearly two feet long turns on you in water up to your lower calves: We sprinted I would say 600 yards in the opposite direction, using a sprinting style such that the bottoms of our feet never once went below the surface of the water. We ran all the way to the far shore, and if we had been in a Warner Brothers cartoon we would have run right INTO the beach, and you would have seen these two mounds of sand racing across the island until they bonked into trees and coconuts fell onto their heads. -- Dave Barry, "The Wonders of Sharks on TV" To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp