================================================ Subject: Re: NCR: A rant for Ed Kiang From: "Joe Earles" To: Date: Fri 25 Jan 2002 23:15:10 -0500 ================================================ Ditto from me. I may not agree with Debbi's style (and I've expressed as much to her in private) but it's just plain wrong to systematically silence someone simply because you don't like the way she deals with things. We all have killfiles and we can decide for ourselves whose messages we read and whose we ignore without anyone making that decision for us. Debbi almost found herself in my killfile, but thankfully I decided to get to know her. I'm now on another Creed list with her (and Keith and others here) and the conversation is so funny my sides are sore from laughing. Oh, and if you don't like the "I blame Debbi" messages, feel free to direct the flames at me - NOT Keith - because it was MY idea. He just decided to run with it so I've opted not to steal his thunder.... ;-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lisa King" To: Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:08 PM Subject: Re: NCR: A rant for Ed Kiang > Might as well ban me too for I am behind Keith and Debbi. > > Lisa King > > > >From: Keith > >Reply-To: Keith > >To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM > >Subject: NCR: A rant for Ed Kiang > >Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:26:03 -0500 > > > >Well, since it seems that in his ever-escalating feud with Debbi, Ed has > >managed to ban any mail coming from www.debbir.com, I've been forced to > >re-sub with my Comteck addy. Personally, I think it's pretty pathetic, Ed, > >that you felt the need to single Debbi out, considering all the OTHER > >bullshit that gets slung on this list, but hey, you're the "head honcho", > >so > >to speak, so I guess that's your prerogative. You've also warned ME in the > >past, and I've tried to abide by your wishes, and the list rules, since > >that > >time, but this one has really got me riled up. You don't have to care > >about > >that, and I don't expect anything to come of this little rant (unless it's > >to get myself banned), but you and everybody else on this list knows that I > >am one of the most outspoken people here. I'm well known for bashing, but > >I > >can also present some very valid points and opinions, and despite the fact > >that I refer to this list as "lamelist", I DO enjoy being here. > > > >So, Ed, in a nutshell, I call bullshit on your chastising of Debbi for her > >outspokenness. If I'm wrong about the ban on "debbir" mail (and I very > >well > >could be), my apologies. If you feel the need to chastise, or even BAN me, > >because of my own outspokenness, so be it (but if you ban me, better do it > >by IP). But if you're going to chastise Debbi for being outspoken, and for > >bashing idiocy when it abounds on this list, and threaten to BAN her for > >those activities, then I feel it is my "patriotic duty" to take up the > >cause > >myself. > > > >NP: Holier Than Thou, Metallica (how appropriate is THAT?) > > > >To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, > >visit: > >http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: > http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp > To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp