================================================ Subject: XP ... Not guilty? From: "Jim KDE-Desktop" To: Date: Tue 22 Jan 2002 22:06:19 -0500 ================================================ On Tuesday 22 January 2002 08:58 pm, Debbi R posted this: > What the hell are you people talking about? There's no way the > operating system can break the spell checker of an application. They are just admitting Step 5. STEP 5 WE ADMITTED TO OURSELVES-AND TO OUR CEO-THE EXACT NATURE OF OUR INFORMATION SYSTEMS' FAILINGS. Victims of a hack or virus have likely already done this as a necessary step in the recovery process. To others, the major failing is this: They are locked into a Microsoft-dominated architecture that feeds them insecure, bloated code. Another failing is the needless codependencies of Microsoft products. Perhaps the most expensive failing of CIOs' Microsoft-dominated IT shops is the upgrade cycle. "There's no other compelling reason to upgrade Office except to maintain compatibility with everyone else," says Larry Shutzberg, CIO of packaging maker Rock-Tenn in Atlanta. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp