================================================ Subject: Re: XP and spellcheckers From: "Debbi R" To: Date: Tue 22 Jan 2002 20:05:44 -0800 ================================================ Comments inline -----Original Message----- From: Creed - 7M3 - Live [mailto:creed7m3live@columbus.rr.com] >Since I am not able to send a private message to you. Without the >message sending an auto-reply to this list. I figure that i'll answer it >here. Wow you are capable of learning. Shocking! >Your comments about the operating system, not being able to cause the >spelling problem was incorrect. Your doubt that there could possibly be >a problem with the interaction between dependent applications was wrong. I challenge anyone to show me a reproducible problem with WinXP breaking the spell checker of a certified application. You know full well I'm in a position to make sure it gets on the radar of the people who are writing fixes and the next versions of the product. >I am not sure about all of the problems with XP. But do not wish to >venture there. Good. You'll lose. Again. >I laughed at the problems with the spell checker and XP. But hope that >they correct the bugs quickly. A lot of people are on the bandwagon for >Microsoft. My work being one of them. Guess what, Jim? I don't care. >My databases all worked correctly with XP. So I am thankful for that >fact. But there is a problem with the TTY driver for NT4 and Windows 95. >I haven't tested the functioning of the TTY driver for XP yet. >Hopefully, it will work correctly. I hope that it doesn't pad a line >(carriage return){XP} or require a NULL character before the first bit >of information prints {Windows 95} Wow, when I typed my reply to your bandwagon comment, I didn't think I could care less. You proved me wrong. To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp